Comments on: The Business SIngularity http://www.internettime.com/2004/09/the-business-singularity/ Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:55:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: jay http://www.internettime.com/2004/09/the-business-singularity/comment-page-1/#comment-33 jay Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:33:00 +0000 http://internettime.com/wordpress/?p=177#comment-33 In case I have not been clear on this, I hope all comment spammers rot in hell. Why trash conversations with messages no one in their right mind will pay attention to? In case I have not been clear on this, I hope all comment spammers rot in hell. Why trash conversations with messages no one in their right mind will pay attention to?

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.internettime.com/2004/09/the-business-singularity/comment-page-1/#comment-32 Anonymous Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:25:00 +0000 http://internettime.com/wordpress/?p=177#comment-32 This post has been removed by a blog administrator. This post has been removed by a blog administrator.

]]> By: Richard Veryard http://www.internettime.com/2004/09/the-business-singularity/comment-page-1/#comment-31 Richard Veryard Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:38:00 +0000 http://internettime.com/wordpress/?p=177#comment-31 Workflow Learning raises interesting questions for what we might call the Architecture of Knowledge. If workers learn in small chunks, how can these chunks be assembled into a coherent body of knowledge? How does the way the work is decomposed between workers affect the learnings that are accessible to them? See my blog at http://www.dontpanic-ii.org/knowledge/2004/09/workflow-learning.html Workflow Learning raises interesting questions for what we might call the Architecture of Knowledge. If workers learn in small chunks, how can these chunks be assembled into a coherent body of knowledge? How does the way the work is decomposed between workers affect the learnings that are accessible to them?

See my blog at http://www.dontpanic-ii.org/knowledge/2004/09/workflow-learning.html

]]>