<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Schadenfreude</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.internettime.com/2006/04/schadenfreude/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.internettime.com/2006/04/schadenfreude/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:55:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Brantley</title>
		<link>http://www.internettime.com/2006/04/schadenfreude/comment-page-1/#comment-528</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Brantley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 15:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internettime.com/wordpress/?p=104#comment-528</guid>
		<description>I too was tired of the fawning coverage of Google and wrote this response to Business 2.0&#039;s cover story that proclaimed Google the smartest company of 2005 - http://eclecticbill.blogspot.com/2006/01/predicting-googles-future.html.  My letter was published in the next issue which was timely considering that Google&#039;s stock fell just after the Business 2.0 story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too was tired of the fawning coverage of Google and wrote this response to Business 2.0&#8242;s cover story that proclaimed Google the smartest company of 2005 &#8211; <a href="http://eclecticbill.blogspot.com/2006/01/predicting-googles-future.html" rel="nofollow">http://eclecticbill.blogspot.com/2006/01/predicting-googles-future.html</a>.  My letter was published in the next issue which was timely considering that Google&#8217;s stock fell just after the Business 2.0 story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

