Comments on: KM & learning: separated at birth? http://www.internettime.com/2006/12/km-learning-separated-at-birth/ Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:55:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Mathemagenic » On knowledge management and learning again http://www.internettime.com/2006/12/km-learning-separated-at-birth/comment-page-1/#comment-841 Mathemagenic » On knowledge management and learning again Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:39:48 +0000 http://internettime.com/?p=775#comment-841 [...] Management and Informal Learning Knowledge Management and Learning - Separated at Birth? - Where They Really? KM & learning: [...] [...] Management and Informal Learning Knowledge Management and Learning – Separated at Birth? – Where They Really? KM & learning: [...]

]]> By: Learning something NEW! « Just Communicate! http://www.internettime.com/2006/12/km-learning-separated-at-birth/comment-page-1/#comment-840 Learning something NEW! « Just Communicate! Mon, 24 Sep 2007 03:11:41 +0000 http://internettime.com/?p=775#comment-840 [...] While researching that “thought,” I stumbled on an interesting KM blog page– KM and learning: separated at birth? by Jay Cross. The headline definitely caught my attention! Can we be good KMers and not be good learners? In the blog Jay references a book he wrote, “Informal Learning”, and offers a WONDERFUL quote about the KM learner: When the job environment changed but slowly, corporate learning involved acquiring the skills and know-how to do the job. Now corporate learning means keeping up with the new things you need to know to do the job. Maybe daily. [...] [...] While researching that “thought,” I stumbled on an interesting KM blog page– KM and learning: separated at birth? by Jay Cross. The headline definitely caught my attention! Can we be good KMers and not be good learners? In the blog Jay references a book he wrote, “Informal Learning”, and offers a WONDERFUL quote about the KM learner: When the job environment changed but slowly, corporate learning involved acquiring the skills and know-how to do the job. Now corporate learning means keeping up with the new things you need to know to do the job. Maybe daily. [...]

]]> By: Mathemagenic http://www.internettime.com/2006/12/km-learning-separated-at-birth/comment-page-1/#comment-839 Mathemagenic Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:00:22 +0000 http://internettime.com/?p=775#comment-839 <strong>On knowledge management and learning again...</strong> ... On knowledge management and learning again…

…

]]> By: soulsoup » » Clearinghouse Post! Part 2 : Knowlede Management, Learning Strategy and Design e-learning blog, elearning blog, knowledge management, e-learning strategy, learning experience design, usability http://www.internettime.com/2006/12/km-learning-separated-at-birth/comment-page-1/#comment-838 soulsoup » » Clearinghouse Post! Part 2 : Knowlede Management, Learning Strategy and Design e-learning blog, elearning blog, knowledge management, e-learning strategy, learning experience design, usability Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:25:35 +0000 http://internettime.com/?p=775#comment-838 [...] [...] [...] [...]

]]> By: David Wilson http://www.internettime.com/2006/12/km-learning-separated-at-birth/comment-page-1/#comment-837 David Wilson Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:04:30 +0000 http://internettime.com/?p=775#comment-837 Jay. I think this has always been a source of some debate - at least in the learning technology community. My own view is that the distinction between KM and learning have always been artificially exagerated, often reflecting the personal and organisational vested interests rather than a hard divide. In the corporate world, KM was rather high-jacked by the IT agenda which had a strong incentive for it not to be associated with anything as mundane as "training". This position looks somewhat irrelvant nowadays. Jay. I think this has always been a source of some debate – at least in the learning technology community. My own view is that the distinction between KM and learning have always been artificially exagerated, often reflecting the personal and organisational vested interests rather than a hard divide. In the corporate world, KM was rather high-jacked by the IT agenda which had a strong incentive for it not to be associated with anything as mundane as “training”. This position looks somewhat irrelvant nowadays.

]]> By: Luis Suarez http://www.internettime.com/2006/12/km-learning-separated-at-birth/comment-page-1/#comment-836 Luis Suarez Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:55:32 +0000 http://internettime.com/?p=775#comment-836 Hi Jay! Thanks a bunch for the feedback to my blog post and for adding some more into the conversation. I must say that while reading through your comments I just couldn't help but agreeing with you on most of what you said, except that I feel that what you describe above is the way both KM and Learning seem to work nowadays, as opposed to some time ago, where both systems were actually substantially different to one another and to what we have nowadays. I have attempted to explain that further in this other <a href="http://www.elsua.net/2006/12/11/knowledge-management-and-learning-separated-at-birth-where-they-really/" rel="nofollow">follow up weblog post</a>. Have a look and see what you think. Thanks! Hi Jay! Thanks a bunch for the feedback to my blog post and for adding some more into the conversation. I must say that while reading through your comments I just couldn’t help but agreeing with you on most of what you said, except that I feel that what you describe above is the way both KM and Learning seem to work nowadays, as opposed to some time ago, where both systems were actually substantially different to one another and to what we have nowadays. I have attempted to explain that further in this other follow up weblog post. Have a look and see what you think. Thanks!

]]>