
Kevin Kelly described what is going on in today’s economy in a Wired article and soon thereafter, a book entitled New Rules for the New Economy nearly ten years ago.
This new economy has three distinguishing characteristics:…
…It is global. It favors intangible things–ideas, information, and relationships. And it is intensely interlinked. These three attributes produce a new type of marketplace and society, one that is rooted in ubiquitous electronic networks.Networks have existed in every economy. What’s different now is that networks, enhanced and multiplied by technology, penetrate our lives so deeply that “network” has become the central metaphor around which our thinking and our economy are organized. Unless we can understand the distinctive logic of networks, we can’t profit from the economic transformation now under way.
…the principles governing the world of the soft–the world of intangibles, of media, of software, and of services–will soon command the world of the hard–the world of reality, of atoms, of objects, of steel and oil, and the hard work done by the sweat of brows. Iron and lumber will obey the laws of software, automobiles will follow the rules of networks, smokestacks will comply with the decrees of knowledge. If you want to envision where the future of your industry will be, imagine it as a business built entirely around the soft, even if at this point you see it based in the hard.
Of course, all the mouse clicks in the world can’t move atoms in real space without tapping real energy, so there are limits to how far the soft will infiltrate the hard. But the evidence everywhere indicates that the hard world is irreversibly softening. Therefore one can gain a huge advantage simply by riding this conversion. To stay ahead, you chiefly need to understand how the soft world works–how networks prosper and grow, how interfaces control attention, how plentitude drives value–and then apply those principles to the hard world of now.






{ 1 trackback }
{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }
Jay, when I move to Silicon Valley with my wife in 1992 at the cusp of the Internet boom my mother-in-law was horrified that we did not own a television.
My curt reply was that if anything noteworthy happened we would get a call from someone we knew. Our ‘network’ would stand on guard.
Bryan Davis of http://www.kikm.org who is known worldwide for his expertise in the area of knowledge markets and networks and I agree to disagree on the worth of networks but I can say we agree on the general notion that networks are two dimensional, fixed and the description is an old fashioned notion.
Consider using flows, zones and if you insist, networks that create themselves or destroy themselves to suit a particular set of people, place or time.
The SUFIs (my interest is storytelling) have a sophisticated notion of networks and learning and this is one source for your consideration–
http://www.amazon.com/Knowing-How-Know-Practical-Philosophy/dp/0863040764/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1229979273&sr=8-1
Another connection that may interest you is that of Pierre Wack (Sufi) who raised Scenario Analysis to a high commercial art at SHELL. Good scenario use requires understanding of when an where to use networks for past, current or future knowledge.
http://www.shell.com/home/content/aboutshell/our_strategy/shell_global_scenarios/scenarios_explorers_guide/scenario_explorers_guide_30102006.html
Hope this helps with your network exploration and good luck.
Cheers,
Nick
http://www.scenario2.com