<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: </title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.internettime.com/2008/12/1845/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.internettime.com/2008/12/1845/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:55:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Rules for the New Economy - Radical Strategies for Living in a Connected World &#171; Social Media Tools for Work &#38; Learning</title>
		<link>http://www.internettime.com/2008/12/1845/comment-page-1/#comment-1643</link>
		<dc:creator>New Rules for the New Economy - Radical Strategies for Living in a Connected World &#171; Social Media Tools for Work &#38; Learning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internettime.com/?p=1845#comment-1643</guid>
		<description>[...] Rules for the New Economy - Radical Strategies for Living in a Connected&#160;World Jay Cross at his Internet Time Blog,  posted about this Wired magazine article written by Kevin Kelly.  The article is an exciting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rules for the New Economy &#8211; Radical Strategies for Living in a Connected&nbsp;World Jay Cross at his Internet Time Blog,  posted about this Wired magazine article written by Kevin Kelly.  The article is an exciting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Trendov</title>
		<link>http://www.internettime.com/2008/12/1845/comment-page-1/#comment-1640</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Trendov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internettime.com/?p=1845#comment-1640</guid>
		<description>Jay, when I move to Silicon Valley with my wife in 1992 at the cusp of the Internet boom my mother-in-law was horrified that we did not own a television.

My curt reply was that if anything noteworthy happened we would get a call from someone we knew.  Our &#039;network&#039; would stand on guard.

Bryan Davis of www.kikm.org who is known worldwide for his expertise in the area of knowledge markets and networks and I agree to disagree on the worth of networks but I can say we agree on the general notion that networks are two dimensional, fixed and the description is an old fashioned notion.

Consider using flows, zones and if you insist, networks that create themselves or destroy themselves to suit a particular set of people, place or time.

The SUFIs (my interest is storytelling) have a sophisticated notion of networks and learning and this is one source for your consideration--
http://www.amazon.com/Knowing-How-Know-Practical-Philosophy/dp/0863040764/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1229979273&amp;sr=8-1

Another connection that may interest you is that of Pierre Wack (Sufi) who raised Scenario Analysis to a high commercial art at SHELL.  Good scenario use requires understanding of when an where to use networks for past, current or future knowledge.

http://www.shell.com/home/content/aboutshell/our_strategy/shell_global_scenarios/scenarios_explorers_guide/scenario_explorers_guide_30102006.html

Hope this helps with your network exploration and good luck.

Cheers,
Nick
www.scenario2.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay, when I move to Silicon Valley with my wife in 1992 at the cusp of the Internet boom my mother-in-law was horrified that we did not own a television.</p>
<p>My curt reply was that if anything noteworthy happened we would get a call from someone we knew.  Our &#8216;network&#8217; would stand on guard.</p>
<p>Bryan Davis of <a href="http://www.kikm.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.kikm.org</a> who is known worldwide for his expertise in the area of knowledge markets and networks and I agree to disagree on the worth of networks but I can say we agree on the general notion that networks are two dimensional, fixed and the description is an old fashioned notion.</p>
<p>Consider using flows, zones and if you insist, networks that create themselves or destroy themselves to suit a particular set of people, place or time.</p>
<p>The SUFIs (my interest is storytelling) have a sophisticated notion of networks and learning and this is one source for your consideration&#8211;<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Knowing-How-Know-Practical-Philosophy/dp/0863040764/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&#038;s=books&#038;qid=1229979273&#038;sr=8-1" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Knowing-How-Know-Practical-Philosophy/dp/0863040764/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&#038;s=books&#038;qid=1229979273&#038;sr=8-1</a></p>
<p>Another connection that may interest you is that of Pierre Wack (Sufi) who raised Scenario Analysis to a high commercial art at SHELL.  Good scenario use requires understanding of when an where to use networks for past, current or future knowledge.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.shell.com/home/content/aboutshell/our_strategy/shell_global_scenarios/scenarios_explorers_guide/scenario_explorers_guide_30102006.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.shell.com/home/content/aboutshell/our_strategy/shell_global_scenarios/scenarios_explorers_guide/scenario_explorers_guide_30102006.html</a></p>
<p>Hope this helps with your network exploration and good luck.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Nick<br />
<a href="http://www.scenario2.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.scenario2.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

