Videocam becomes still cam?

by Jay Cross on February 18, 2009

hf10
I splurged and bought myself to a snazzy HD Canon videocam. I still figuring out how it works but it’s clearly a powerful little machine.

I need a new still cam soon. Ever since bouncing off some cobblestones in Rome, my beloved little Casio Xilim camera has been acting crazy. It had not occurred to me when I bought it, but should I simply use the new Canon for both video and stills?

This afternoon the rains stopped long enough for me to take my standard 25-minute walk through the North Berkeley neighborhood. I took the videocam along to take stills, for example:

Home in North Berkeley hills

Our humble house.

Meyer lemon paradise

Meyer lemons on the tree out front.

View of the bridge are a recurrent miracle

We are directly across from the Golden Gate.

For you Jay-groupies, here’s a slideshow. Here are the pics. The colors are garish, but I assume there’s a way to tame that down. What do you think? Good enough to use as a primary cam? What’s been your experience in using a single cam for video and stills?

Yesterday I made a practice video to see how that works. This was impromptu, unscripted, low light, easy-mode recording. It’s not pro quality but in time, and with friends’ help, I should be able to create what I am looking for.

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

Sydney Accommodation February 19, 2009 at 8:02 pm

I tried to take stills with my little JVC Everio but it turned out to only be 1 pixel and ended up getting a decent stills camera as well. Will be interested to see /hear what quality fo results you get. Jamie S.A.

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Previous post:

Next post:

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 License. Real Time Web Analytics