<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whose learning are you responsible for?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.internettime.com/2009/10/whose-learning-are-you-responsible-for/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.internettime.com/2009/10/whose-learning-are-you-responsible-for/</link>
	<description>from Jay Cross and Internet Time Group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:23:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lori Zittnan</title>
		<link>http://www.internettime.com/2009/10/whose-learning-are-you-responsible-for/comment-page-1/#comment-2490</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori Zittnan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internettime.com/?p=2787#comment-2490</guid>
		<description>This article is not just for corporate, but relevant for non-profits as well;  Especially those with a volunteer membership base. It sounds like prudent stewardship of resources.  Leveraging experienced volunteers, equipping existing volunteer workers, and gently drawing in those who express an interest in volunteering through conversation-- builds relationship.  Relationship and connection is one of the primary reason why people volunteer.  They want to make a difference, they want to participate in meaningful work, they want to fit with others who are like minded.  This is also true of donors, vendors, and educators within the non profit sphere.  When R &amp; D dollars are allocated for a product or service to support a non-profit initiative... I agree, don&#039;t skimp on creating and implementing complementary conduit to keep conversation flowing from all stakeholders. It helps them catch the vision.  After all, whether corporate or non-profit - the end user experience is the ultimate assessment. Fresh input keeps non-profit and corporate alike in tune with their audience and the problems a product or service claims to solve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is not just for corporate, but relevant for non-profits as well;  Especially those with a volunteer membership base. It sounds like prudent stewardship of resources.  Leveraging experienced volunteers, equipping existing volunteer workers, and gently drawing in those who express an interest in volunteering through conversation&#8211; builds relationship.  Relationship and connection is one of the primary reason why people volunteer.  They want to make a difference, they want to participate in meaningful work, they want to fit with others who are like minded.  This is also true of donors, vendors, and educators within the non profit sphere.  When R &amp; D dollars are allocated for a product or service to support a non-profit initiative&#8230; I agree, don&#8217;t skimp on creating and implementing complementary conduit to keep conversation flowing from all stakeholders. It helps them catch the vision.  After all, whether corporate or non-profit &#8211; the end user experience is the ultimate assessment. Fresh input keeps non-profit and corporate alike in tune with their audience and the problems a product or service claims to solve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
