|

1996 Not
so many years ago, banks were peeking out from under regulations that had blanketed
them since the Great Depression. Before the nineties, banks had prospered if they
executed well. Afterward, they excelled only at the expense of their competitors.
The competitors were ferocious—no longer simply other banks, they included
aggressive insurance companies, stockbrokers, financial planners, credit card
firms, finance companies, leasing companies, credit unions and more. Six
years ago, I was managing marketing and special projects for a company that enjoyed
wide success training bankers. Our programs had taught more than a million bankers
to make sound loan decisions, serve customers well, and sell services. By
1995, however, bank
customers were taking their business to innovators, not rule-followers. Our
standard sales training wasn’t doing the trick for bankers. How could we
help them become more innovative and customer-focused? How about leadership? Bingo!
A course in frontline leadership would set us apart and help our customers think
out of the box. That’s how I came to invest two months studying leadership. Intellectual daredevil that I am, I set out to identify
what top-performing leaders do. From March through May of 1996, I discussed leadership
with dozens of people and read Drucker,
Bennis, Kouzes & Posner, Schein, Schon, Argyris, Depree, Katzenbach, Blanchard,
Gellerman, Handy, Hamel & Prahalad, Senge, and even Tom Peters. I concluded
that exemplary leaders inspire followers, leverage the power of people,
continuously improve performance, and feel personally empowered. Front-line leaders thrived on change. They opened people’s
eyes to marketplace realities and converted higher-level objectives into a vision
everyone could understand. They used “localized reengineering” to
reinvent the workplace. They intuitively applied the 80/20 rule and eliminated
the inconsequential. They transformed the way business was done. It
struck me that leaders needed not only to work on skills but also to work on themselves.
Leading a team into uncharted territory required confidence and self-knowledge.
Successful leaders knew who they were, were mindfully aware of what was going
on around them, and exuded confidence that they could get the job done. My marketing
antennae told me this personal empowerment angle would also make for a popular
course. At
the time I was doing my research, Harvard Business School’s John Kotter
was championing the concept that leaders and managers are entirely different breeds.
The manager keeps things on track; the leader breaks through obsolete boundaries.
Managers control; leaders inspire.
| As I saw
it, the manager’s job was to keep
things within reason. Managers were border guards, reining in behavior that overshot
or undershot accepted standards. |
The leader’s role
was to draw new boundaries—change the organization, and then to inspire
people to get out of their comfort zone and into the new groove. |  | 2001Now leadership is popular in business.
Books
teach you leadership’s 108 skills, 101 Innovative Ways, 30 Marine Management
Principles, 22 Vital Traits, 21 Indispensable Qualities, 21 Irrefutable Laws,
21 Most Powerful Minutes, 18 Workshops, 17 Indisputable Laws, 17 Principles, 15
Secrets, 11 Lessons, 12 Principles, 10 Traits, Ten Keys, Nine Keys, 7 Acts of
Courage, Seven Habits, Six Fail-safe Strategies, Six Strategic Principles, Five
Temptations, Five Giant Steps, Five Decision Styles, Five Practices, Four Disciplines,
Four Practical Revolutions, Three Keys, One Minute, and the Other 90%. You
can learn from such luminaries as Jack
Welch, Abraham
Lincoln, Ernest Shakleton, Sun-Tzu, Dean Smith,
Attila
the Hun, John F. Kennedy, Carl von Clausewitz, George Patton, Jesus, Theodore
Roosevelt, Vince Lombardi, Robert E. Lee, Admiral Lord Nelson, Ben & Jerry,
Shakespeare, Bill Russell, God, Hannibal, Niccolo Machiavelli, Gandhi, Ronald
Reagan, Elizabeth I, the Founding Fathers, and Heraclitus. (Sun Tzu leads
the pack but perhaps that’s because his work went out of copyright several
thousand years ago.) Why
the current interest in leadership? For one thing, the boundaries are no longer
clear. They shift all the time. Nothing, but nothing, is rock solid any more.
Consider, six years
ago: - the Internet
was not even a blip on the Fortune 500’s radar. The Web was for geeks; there
were 23,500 sites (today it’s 32,000,000). Netscape was poised to go public.
The Dow was under 5,000. These things did not exist: Microsoft Internet Explorer,
eBay, ADSL, DVD, 56K modems, ICQ, Google, or eBusiness.
- many
companies were still command-and-control hierarchies. Competitors were the enemy.
Outsourcing was uncommon. Telecommuting was virtually unknown.
- companies still made five-year
plans.
- the speed of light
was thought to be a constant.
Wide, ever-shifting boundaries
change all the rules. We once rewarded compliance; today we reward innovation.
We once praised obedience; today we praise ad hoc solutions. Yesterday’s
subversive employee is today’s innovator. Leadership—creating value
by hopping outside boundaries—used to be the province of a well-paid, well-educated
few somewhere near the top of the pyramid. Turbulent
times have converted leadership into a responsibility shared by all members of
the organization. These
leaders realize the importance of the web where everything is connected. Savvy
companies share information far and wide. As Jan Carlzon
says, “Information tells you about your possibilities. A person who has
source information cannot escape taking responsibility.” In his book, Moments
of Truth, Carlzon explains: “We
[once] controlled people at work by giving orders and instructions, telling them
down to every detail what they should do out there—although we never had
any real feeling for or information about what the customer really wanted. The
worst of it was that the instructions really amounted to telling people what they
were not allowed to do; it was just a way of limiting their responsibility. “But
what you need to do today is open things up so people can take responsibility.
You have to give them the authority they need to make decisions on the spot. You
do that by telling people where you want to get to as a company, and the strategy
you want to use to get there. Then you give the people the freedom within the
limits of your business strategy to act on behalf of the company.” Networks have made information both inside and outside the
organization abundant, and this shifts the burden of leadership to everyone’s
shoulders. 
The
world has speeded up. Everything’s
faster. Andy Grove says the Internet is the reason. The flowering of the knowledge
economy is certainly a co-conspirator.
Intellectual
capital has become more valuable than physical assets. Wall Street funds expectations,
not cash earnings. Companies build relationships with customers instead of selling
them things. A firm’s process know-how is its core strength. The information
imbedded in a product is more valuable than the physical product itself. Intangibles
rule. They are mind-matter. They can combine, reconfigure, deconstruct, and morph
into new forms. A single good idea can eradicate old value and create new wealth.
Intangibles are bits, not atoms. Bits travel at network speeds. The net girdles
the earth. As a result, the entire world is rocking to a higher beta—more
variations, faster cycles, greater extremes. Uncertainty shakes everyone’s foundation. Stress is rampant.
Everyone needs a Plan C and a Plan D to supplement Plan A and Plan B. A friend
mentioned that since he had small children, he was looking for a steady job with
a big company. These days he might find more security free-lancing. It
used to be easy to tell the good guys from the bad. For example, when I was working
for UNIVAC, the competition
was IBM, Burroughs, NCR, Control Data, and Honeywell. Rarely did I encounter an
outlier like Nixdorf or Fujitsu. If
you’re in the computer business today, who’s your competition? It
could be a services firm, an ASP, a telephone company, an online auctioneer, or
an upstart you’ve never heard of. Competition could come from Europe, Asia,
or anywhere else on the planet. Your
worst competitor over the long haul is not even in your business yet. That’s
the nature of disruptive
technologies. Ceaseless innovation plants more seeds of disruption than ever
before, one of which will undercut your core business. A tricky thing about disruptive
technology is that it loads the dice against established players. Disruption spreads
from where you least expect it. Leaders must challenge conventional wisdom at
every step. Competitors used to be companies you tried to beat. Now you
make them your partner; you seek opportunities together; you share the load because
there are too many options to consider. Ten
years ago, tapping the keys of a computer was secretarial work. Today computer
literacy is a prerequisite to leadership. Not only must the leader do email and
surf the web for news, she must also grok
the potential of it to shift the playing field. Every business that is not an
e-business is threatened by e-business. Business today is unpredictable. The leader confronts an avalanche
of information. It’s difficult to filter the signal from the noise. This
favors the generalist leader who can mentally hop from one field to another-the
specialist is too likely to be blind-sided. Peter
Drucker tells us that the defining characteristic of leaders is followers.
Followers, however, have changed, big time. As
democracy swept the political world, it simultaneously dismantled the autocratic
corporation. Today’s workers are out for themselves. Not selfishly but realistically.
Free agents. They recognize that their careers will last many times longer than
their employer. Fast Company
exhorts them to look out for “Brand You.” Tom Peters rants
that the ideal structure is the “unit of one.” The Cluetrain has stopped to
pick up people unabashedly loyal to themselves before all others. Our market-driven
world drives people to increase their personal marketability. While
some decry high turnover, other companies turn the mindset of the new recruit
to their advantage. After all, the companies want innovators, not followers. They
prefer self-starters who will do what’s right rather than those who wait
for instructions. They need people more concerned with getting the job done than
punching the clock. Corporations used to bribe workers who had critically needed
talents to stay on board. High-tech companies have learned that money doesn't
necessarily talk to a young person who drives a Porsche, watches a giant-screen
TV, and owns a nice home. What keeps people on board is the opportunity to develop,
to build valued skills, to achieve certifications, and to add to their store of
intellectual capital. The
wise approach is to make
the interests of the worker and the needs of the organization congruent. Both
seek to make the worker a more valuable asset. The leader’s role is to make
this clear and to empower followers to act in their own enlightened self-interest. What’s
a leader to do? The job seems to be to keep people on the right path, but keep
them from being stuck in ruts.
John Seely Brown tells
us that, “An organization is a knowledge ecology; it is fundamentally dynamic
and gains robustness through diversity. But ecologies cannot be designed; they
can only be nurtured. The key to nurturing these ecologies is finding the balance
between spontaneity and structure. People need both the latitude to improvise
and the business processes to apply their knowledge. Thus, creative leaders must
learn to be bold yet profoundly grounded. It's easy to be conservative and grounded,
or to be radical and impulsive. It's hard to be both grounded and radical (and
the literal meaning of the word—going to the root—suggests exactly
the right approach).” To
be effective, leaders must shift their focus from static to dynamic, from physical
to virtual, from financial results to financial expectations, from machines to
people, from goods to services, from analytical to intuitive, and from institutions
to individuals. How
can we get them there? While I’m generally an advocate of eLearning,
I don’t think it’s the right way to nurture leadership skills. In
my own case, a one-week intensive workshop at
the Center for Creative Leadership taught me more about leadership than reading
thousands of pages of Drucker, Bennis, and Kouzes. To
become a great leader, most of us will need to observe a great leader in action.
A personal mentor is invaluable. The
ultimate way to transform ordinary folks into leaders is to convince them to define
themselves as leaders. Leaders learn by doing. Jay Cross is a leader of the
highest order: he leads himself around in circles and pulls people into his learning
vortex with grace and fun. That’s why we love him. You will too. Check out
http://www.jaycross.com/. JCTCNL093001GR
LiNE
Zine retains the copyright in all of the material on these web pages as a collective
work under copyright laws. You may not republish, redistribute or exploit in any
manner any material from these pages without the express consent of LiNE Zine
and the author. Contact permissions@linezine.com
for reprints and permissions. You may, however, download or print copyrighted
material for your individual and non-commercial use. The
article is reprinted here with permission of Learning in the New Economy Magazine
(LiNE Zine). All rights reserved. Go directly to this article on the LiNE
Zine site. Copyright
(c) 2000-2002 LiNE Zine (www.linezine.com). |