How long to develop eLearning?

VNU's Online Learning eNews just arrived by email. Last week a reader asked how many hours it takes to develop one hour of e-learning. Or a page. Or a sim.

My answer:

Jay Cross ( [email protected] ) notes
that the reader's query "presumes that learning should be
measured in hours or pages rather than outcomes.

"Isn't a short course worth more than a long one that
teaches the same thing?" asks Cross, a Berkeley, Calif.,
e-learning consultant.

"The query is akin to asking how long it takes to
write a poem," he says. "It depends on the poet --
and the quality of the poem.

"Most of us could labor a lifetime and not write
a line the quality of Robert Frost.

"On the other hand, I could easily produce hours
of e-learning every day, assuming that quality is
not an issue."


Posted by Jay Cross at December 17, 2002 03:50 AM | TrackBack
Comments

Seems like there are two questions here. 1. What constitutes "one hour of e-learning?" and 2. How long does it take to develop "one hour of e-learning?"

I think these same questions are hold-overs from CBT development, where courses were [and still are] usually measured in "seat time." CBT development companies typically bid on projects based on finished hours of CBT, as if each learner will complete the course in the same amount of time. For example, it might cost you $30,000 to have Company A build you a "one-hour" CBT. Then that company has page and interactivity metrics that dictate how much content fills that one-hour course, as well as how long it takes to create those pages and interactions. E-learning companies have followed suit, it seems.

The irony, of course, is that CBT [and a lot of e-learning, of course] is promoted as being self-paced. Theoretically, each learner can move through the course at his or her own pace. So how do you know it's really a "one hour" course?

I suppose this is where business needs come in. It's difficult to quantify learning material either by outcome or by seat/development time. But maybe development companies are just giving their customers what they need, a way to measure what they're buying in terms that are easiest for them to understand and to make comparisons between vendors.

Have a good day.

Posted by: Lori Mortimer at December 17, 2002 02:22 PM

Lori, you are too kind. Neither of the two questions are legitimate. Duration is an inappropriate meausre of learning. The issue is confusing because the seat-time racket is an old one; we're quite accustomed to thinking that way. It keeps schools afloat.

Five or six years ago I led a session at Training in Atlanta on corporate universities -- forty-five minutes of proselytizing for business goals, pragmatism, goal orientation, and practicality. My point was that corporate universities are not supposed to be academic.

I wasn't persuasive. A hand went up in the audience that led to the question, "If the learning is self-paced, how are we going to award CEUs?"

Posted by: jay at December 18, 2002 06:13 AM

30 Poppy Lane
Berkeley, California 94708

1.510.528.3105 (office & cell)



Subscribe to this Blog

Enter your email address to subscribe. We vow never to share your information with anyone. No Spam.

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Reference Pages

Articles
Blogs
Building Community
CSS, Semantic Mark-Up, and codes
Design
First Principles
Glossary
How People Learn
Knowledge Management
Learning Links
Learning Standards
Making It Work (Implementing)
Metrics & ROI
Presentations
Psychology
Social Software
String theory
The eLearning Museum
Time
Visual Learning


Search


Our Infrequent Newsletter
Sign up for our sporadic newsletter.
Email:


Entries by category...

Blogging
Books
Collaboration
Customer care
Design
Emergent Learning
handbook
Jokes
Just Jay
Learning
Meta
Networking
Outbound
Recycled from Blogger
Ref
store
The Industry
Time
Visual
Workflow-based eLearning


Blogroll


Internet Time Group



© 2004 Internet Time Group



Click for Berkeley, California Forecast
Berkeley, California


Recent entries

New Blog
Blogger Experience, Housekeeping, Something New
Loosely Coupled
Above all
Demographics is destiny
Are you setting the bar high enough?
Virtual Apps
Aerobic Learning
Work as Video Game
Oracle and Macromedia, Sitting in a Tree
The Blogosphere
ASTD Silicon Valley
Performance Support
Kingsbridge Conference Center
First Post by Email
Transition
Inactive Blog
RSS Feed for New Site
Comment Spam
Testing ... testing ... 1...2..3
IT Doesn't Matter - Learning Does.
All blogging is political
Mutlimedia Learning
Damn, damn, double damn
Nonverbal impact?
The New Religion
Shhhhh.....
Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf!
Business Process Management (2)
Really Big
Business Process Management Conference
WorkFLOW
Don't Lose a Common Sense: LISTEN
It's only natural
Gmail!
Go with the flow
Time Out for the Fair
Informal get-together in SF this Wednesday
Repetition, reverb, and echoes
Who Knows?
Ur-blogging
Cognitive Mapping
Push vs pull
The Big Picture on ROI
Art Break
TDF Finale
New Community of Practice Forming
Dropouts
More TDF04
Training Directors Forum 2004
A Rare One-Liner
PlaNetwork LIVE 2
PlaNetwork LIVE
ASTD 2004 Leftovers
Googlism
Worker Effectiveness Improvement, not KM
Upcoming Events
eLearning Effectiveness?
Jay's Talk at ASTD
Mintzberg & Cooperider
Lest ye forget
ASTD International Conference & Exposition 2004
Knowledge Tips
What is Workflow Learning?
ASTD msg 1 of n
Look out, it's Outlook
Collaboration at ASTD Next Week
Tell me a story
User indifference
Interdependence
The shortest presentation on metrics you will ever hear
Back to Blogger
Windows fixes
The Alchemy of Growth
Grab bag
Very loosely coupled
E-Learning from Practice to Profit
Robin Good kicks off Competitive Edge
China Bloggers
Sonoma Dreaming
Upcoming Events
Emergent Learning Forum: Simulations
'Lanta
The Best Things in Life Are Free
Metrics and Web Services
OpEd: ROI vs. Metrics
e-Merging e-Learning
Loosely Coupled
Search me
Exercise?