Impermanence

Dave Winer & Mark Pilgrim recently had a dust-up over the propriety of changing the words in a blog once it's been posted to the web. Mark accused Dave of changing the wording (and meaning) of what he wrote on DaveNet post-posting. Mark set up a bot to periodically take a peak at Dave's blog and post a before & after whenever changes were made. Dave thought this underhanded and a copyright violation to boot. Vowing to get Mark, when Dave handed out his new business cards to some people, he would say "See what it says there? Harvard LAW School. We've got a lot of lawyers on our side."

The Dave & Mark Show is over for now, but the issue remains. Trend-setter Rebecca Blood thinks it dishonorable to recall what you've published, aside from fixing typos. Her logic is that you don't know who's already read the initial version. She says bloggers should treat errors the way the press does: Don't change the original; post a retraction.

By and large, I do not agree. I think of my blog in several different ways. I use it to voice my opinons, as I'm doing now.

I also use the blog as a reference source. It's a content management system. Some of my pages, e.g. How People Learn or Glossary, are collections of five years or more of links and content. Naturally, I prune the dead links. And if I change my mind, I may rewrite a section entirely.

Do I need to highlight new or changed material?

No. That gets into "How old is old?"

My eLearning Jump Page has more than a hundred links. My original links page pre-dates every link on the same page. Does it make any sense to highlight the entire page as having changed?

So be forewarned: I may change this posting tomorrow or five minutes from now or a year hence. Few things are permanent in the digital age.


Posted by Jay Cross at July 27, 2003 01:17 PM | TrackBack
Comments

Its an interesting topic!

My opinion is that you cannot change blog postings - apart from typos. Often I feel tempted to add a link or otherwise update a posting, however, I would rather follow the newspaper tradition, and add a new entry.

In cases of outright mistakes or regrets - that can happen - I think, contrary to Rebecca Blood, that its all right to completely delete a posting. You cannot, as a free blogger, be forced to maintain a posting if you yourself disagree with it. To that end, I have experienced that (not in a blog posting, but a plain HTML page) the use of one particular word, could be "S E X", has attracted unwanted search engine hits. Should I have renounce on that posting, I might have had to double the number of times that particular word appeared and thus doubled the number of unwanted visitors. I think in that case you better delete the entry.

In the past I guess, that in some cases I have even changed the meaning of a posting. Following this debate I would, in the future, think twice.

I very much consider my own blogs reference sources, like a CMS: its knowledge made explicit, public and searchable - for others and myself.

As for your "blog", Jay, I would not consider the pages in question, e.g. "How people Learn" or "Glossary" a blog posting. I consider such pages, whatever their technical format (that one may now comment on them, etc), plain HTML pages of a good site ;-) Keep them, update them, change for the better - do whatever is suitable. In regard of the discussion on blogging, I do not see the problem.

Best, Jesper

Posted by: Jesper Hundebøl at August 12, 2003 11:11 PM

"What is truth?"

Should a blog entry have the same words on the screen no matter when it's viewed? That would be "reliable," that is, replicable.

But what if I've changed my mind or found a better way to express myself? A revised blog entry would represent my current feeling better than the original, would it not?

If I read a post on someone's blog, I expect it to reflect how they feel now. I don't assume they've changed their mind since they wrote it several days ago. Unless I'm an attorney or forensic accountant to whom timing is of paramount importance, a revised blog entry is closer to current reality than the initial one.

Ted Nelson had a solution for this: track each and every change. His byzantine solutions never made it off the drawing board: It's not worth the hassle.

My blog will be like my resume, honest but changing to reflect the current spin. There's more than one way to tell a story.

When I read other people's words, I prefer an edited version to the discombobulated raw notes.

Maybe I'll start posting a revision date when I make major changes.

Posted by: Jay Cross at August 16, 2003 10:11 PM

30 Poppy Lane
Berkeley, California 94708

1.510.528.3105 (office & cell)



Subscribe to this Blog

Enter your email address to subscribe. We vow never to share your information with anyone. No Spam.

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Reference Pages

Articles
Blogs
Building Community
CSS, Semantic Mark-Up, and codes
Design
First Principles
Glossary
How People Learn
Knowledge Management
Learning Links
Learning Standards
Making It Work (Implementing)
Metrics & ROI
Presentations
Psychology
Social Software
String theory
The eLearning Museum
Time
Visual Learning


Search


Our Infrequent Newsletter
Sign up for our sporadic newsletter.
Email:


Entries by category...

Blogging
Books
Collaboration
Customer care
Design
Emergent Learning
handbook
Jokes
Just Jay
Learning
Meta
Networking
Outbound
Recycled from Blogger
Ref
store
The Industry
Time
Visual
Workflow-based eLearning


Blogroll


Internet Time Group



© 2004 Internet Time Group



Click for Berkeley, California Forecast
Berkeley, California


Recent entries

New Blog
Blogger Experience, Housekeeping, Something New
Loosely Coupled
Above all
Demographics is destiny
Are you setting the bar high enough?
Virtual Apps
Aerobic Learning
Work as Video Game
Oracle and Macromedia, Sitting in a Tree
The Blogosphere
ASTD Silicon Valley
Performance Support
Kingsbridge Conference Center
First Post by Email
Transition
Inactive Blog
RSS Feed for New Site
Comment Spam
Testing ... testing ... 1...2..3
IT Doesn't Matter - Learning Does.
All blogging is political
Mutlimedia Learning
Damn, damn, double damn
Nonverbal impact?
The New Religion
Shhhhh.....
Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf!
Business Process Management (2)
Really Big
Business Process Management Conference
WorkFLOW
Don't Lose a Common Sense: LISTEN
It's only natural
Gmail!
Go with the flow
Time Out for the Fair
Informal get-together in SF this Wednesday
Repetition, reverb, and echoes
Who Knows?
Ur-blogging
Cognitive Mapping
Push vs pull
The Big Picture on ROI
Art Break
TDF Finale
New Community of Practice Forming
Dropouts
More TDF04
Training Directors Forum 2004
A Rare One-Liner
PlaNetwork LIVE 2
PlaNetwork LIVE
ASTD 2004 Leftovers
Googlism
Worker Effectiveness Improvement, not KM
Upcoming Events
eLearning Effectiveness?
Jay's Talk at ASTD
Mintzberg & Cooperider
Lest ye forget
ASTD International Conference & Exposition 2004
Knowledge Tips
What is Workflow Learning?
ASTD msg 1 of n
Look out, it's Outlook
Collaboration at ASTD Next Week
Tell me a story
User indifference
Interdependence
The shortest presentation on metrics you will ever hear
Back to Blogger
Windows fixes
The Alchemy of Growth
Grab bag
Very loosely coupled
E-Learning from Practice to Profit
Robin Good kicks off Competitive Edge
China Bloggers
Sonoma Dreaming
Upcoming Events
Emergent Learning Forum: Simulations
'Lanta
The Best Things in Life Are Free
Metrics and Web Services
OpEd: ROI vs. Metrics
e-Merging e-Learning
Loosely Coupled
Search me
Exercise?