Los Angeles Convention Center
Monday, October 18, 1999

 Jay's notes & photos of the event.

Gloria Gery kicked things off after 25 minutes of silence (AV snafu), certainly an embarrassment for the publishers of Presentations magazine. 3,000 people have registered for this event, 4,500 if you count everyone who passes through the door. Online Learning News has 55,000 email subscribers!

Fusion of learning and doing on the way.

Pitfalls of online learning:

  • falling in love with the messenger (confuse means and ends)

  • becoming isolated from the core business

  • defaulting to the familiar (automating the last war)

  • not integrating with other organizations

Milken

Mike makes good use of graphics to express himself: Photographsof Berkeley, Watts Riots, Ross Perot style charts

Native Americans purchased Manhattan for $24

Had they invested $24 at 8% compound interest for 373 years, they've have $70 trillion today.

1958 vs 1999 in $ billions

Oil companies grew from $28 to $375

Steel crawled from $12 to $13

Technology business zoomed from $9 to $1381

Pharmaceuticals grew from $6 to $663

1920s, automobile, cost was 60% was raw materials & energy

1990s, chip, only 2% of cost was raw materials

balance sheets of today reflect little of the true value of an enterprise—its human and intellectual capital

Dow

1% cagr 1965-1982; 14.5% cagr 1983-1999

Knowledge Universe

individuals must cope with

  • skills obsolescence as product cycles shorten
  • downsizing/outsourcing
  • multiple careers in a lifetime
  • need for constant education

Leap Pad, a KU product w/ 1 gig, helps kids, soon adults, to read, for $40

 

Panel:

  1. Gloria Gery (comments =#1)
  2. Michael Hawley of the Media Lab 2
  3. Michael Allen (PLATO, creator of Authorware) 4
  4. Michael Milken 5
    Bob Jecman of Intel 3

 #5 KU is young, industry is immature. At the highest level is art, not science. ILT will continue on but adaptive learning (learning that becomes your friend) is just starting now.

 

#4 design? access is important but that’s not all there is. not using what we know.

 

#2 media lab = nuthouse. learning by building things. deny that anything’s “impossible.”

 

#3 portable? wireless is on the way.

 

 #5 silent stars didn’t make it to talkies. radio personalities didn’t all play on t.v. moving old-style learning to the net doesn’t play. how can we personalize the learning experience? takes entertainment, too.

 

#2 Lucasfilm. starwars script #1 pre-word processor. now his next film will be 100% digital, not a film at all. by contrast, people are pretty much the same as during the era of the greeks.

 

#5 entertainment industry doesn’t have mandatory attendance. they have to make things enjoyable enough to draw an audience. that’s the proper goal for training.

 

Gloria: seductive learning. but little time for development. what do we do?

 

#4 authorware – it’s terrible. people say, “I’ve been a student, so I know how to teach.” wrong! there’s a lot more to it. we need better tools, better leadership.

 

#5 democracy, capitalism – these depend on the success of online learning. the frustration is that anyone can join in this business. there are no barriers to entry.


Gloria announces that the refreshment break is being sponsored by SmartForce, which we used to know as CBT Systems.

During the break, participants snap at the new brochures like hungry fish.

Bob Jecman, Intel

“ Intel Content services is working with CBT Systems, a leader in computer-based IT training, to deliver interactive, 3d and streaming media to its customers on the web.”

 

CBT 3D streaming DEMO. walking down halls into office. can navigate through office space. drill down from whiteboard, get 3-d models. then to server room, to simulate setting up a firewall.

 

Ah ha! Here’s a useful application. You can grab a server, stick it in a rack, and cable components together. Buzz goes through the audience.

 

DEMO #2. Bluetooth wireless transmission from one PC to another via RF. This technology could be imbedded in a cell phone, a palm device – and communicate 10 meters or so. 1 mb/sec transfer. Andy Grove  AVI appears on screen.

 

Later, CBT Systems leads a full SRO demo of 3D video streaming in the Intel lab downstairs:

 

 

Michael Hawley, MIT Media Lab, sits down at the piano.

 

“Things that think.”

in steve jobs’ new office at pixar, the table is top from a bosendorfer piano on legs. any meeting with steve is a jam session.

 

Michael sits down at the piano and plays the graceful ghost rag. Hawley had received a call from the van cliburn foundation (which holds a competition every four years.) michael was invited to their first amateur competition. unlike the pros, these people had lives. steve jobs lamented that this is not done for the computer industry. where’s the amateur spirit?

 

are recitals dead? in the 1800s, liszt started the public performance. opened the lid to the audience, painted the piano black for dramatic effect, and dressed like a rock star. with a piano you only get something out when you put something in. there’s room for two on the bench. it was the sports of its era.

 

for us, the personal computer has passed its peak.

 

Smithsonian institution trying to put together an exhibit on invention. they called ray Bradbury. “I’ll give you my suggestions but I don’t want any questions later. and my fee will be $100,000.” the Smithsonian blew off $500,000 chasing other ideas before calling Bradbury back for help. for $100K, he said one word, “garages.” it’s the right word. henry ford’s, hewlett’s, jobs’, edison’s, etc.

 

michael’s one word for us is “Pinocchio.” shows us a videotape from 1988 (“the late bronze age”), apple’s knowledge navigator. fantasy: they got a lot of it right but underestimated the power of the internet. tough to estimate where we’ll be in five years.

 


 

1980-1990 IBM earned $8-$9 billion a year. ’90 IBM earned $11 billion! then 0 billion, then -$9 billion, then -$15 billion.

 

ATT spun off bell labs, chucked western electric into Lucent. within a year and a half, lucent much larger than ATT itself. ATT almost thrown out of the game.

 

computing + communications = the disruptive coupling

 

Galapagos. marine iguana, tiny lava lizard sitting on its head. a different perspective is worth a hundred points of IQ. Darwin only 22 on the beagle.

 

you don’t learn to swim by going online.

 

someday you’ll pick up a Barbie doll and it will have more computing hardware than a space shuttle.

 

furby has more processing power than the lunar lander. capillaries from variety of devices. furbies will hook into the net. toys. values of play. the lessons stick.

 

lego. wooden blocks. plastic holds them together. mindstorms sold 100,000 – 30,000 for kids, the rest for silicon valley engineers. legos coming to life.

 

tomato inscribed with instructions.

 

counter intelligence. about developing the smart kitchen. NSA calls, saying, “count us in.”

 

putting your body on line. US spends a trillion a year on medical care. we spend twice as much per capita as anyone else. heart sensor + wristwatch = blip, blip, you have two hours to live. healthcare is now disconnected. paper records, lost ambulance, etc.

 

open heart survivors. two questions: do you have a confidante? (e.g. wife, partner, great friend) are you a member of a group? six months after surgery, all the no/no category folk were dead. 70% (I think) of the connected people live on. the reason you live is other people. if your loved ones could monitor your health, imagine….

 

teller. 1856.  French dealing with skirmishes in Algeria. tribes led by magicians and witch doctors. French invited a magician to visit the front lines. Robert Houdin. platter; tureen of steaming coffee appears. strongbox. pick it up. abracadabra. can’t pick it up. electromagnet under stage. Algerians capitulate to the superior magician.

 

 sooner we can break past the glass of the monitor, the better off we’ll be. do something wonderful with this stuff.

The Exhibit hall is chock full of Internet-learning vendors. most are making the usual exhibitor mistake of actually answering my question of “what have you got?” rather than finding out who I am and what I’m interested in.

The multi-vendor booths are not cutting it, at least for me. At the Lotus booth, the president of some tiny firm showed me a pedestrian call center training program; Click2Learn had a dozen “partners,” each doing their own thing. Lots of traffic but little in it for the sponsoring organization.

 

Saba Software’s booth had a fellow whose badge identified him as “Director of Marketing,” but who was actually a professional presenter, giving an overview of Saba’s relationship with Netscape. Saba is a web-based training management system, pure HTML, furthering the “learner-centric paradigm.”

Teamscape provides a similar offering (Schwab’s a client) and has more user-friendly marketing. They took part in the learner server shootout that will appear in PC Week in mid November; Saba didn’t show.

Allison Rossett and Bob Hoffman of SDSU gave a user-friendly breakout for academics on shortening the distance of distance learning, recounting their lessons from leading distance ed programs.

 

Studies document that focus on learner choice and learner-centered strategies  have a positive impact on learning outcomes.

 

Hoffman described the “I CARE” framework for bring faculty up to speed. It’s low tech or high, your choice.

 

Introduction

Connect

Apply – do it

Reflect – put new knowledge into personal context, closure by telling others

Extend – assess, evaluate, remediate, enrich, more info

 

check out edweb.sdsu.edu/edtec

also sandbox.sdsu.edu

 

Remember: Edison thought movies would replace textbooks.

 

Don’t play one media against another, e.g. which is better for X. Think of the cumulative results. Or good web vs poor instruction. Etc.

 

Tuesday, October 19, 1999

Jeff Papos, Lotus

 

KM is the killer app

evolution of our paradigms

email. now more than electrified mail. latency of knowledge.

networks. were resource sharing (Novell). then shared info. Internet now about electronic community.

learning is a lot more than online learning. now it’s about creating the “knowledge enterprise.” distributed learning is about rewriting all of our business processes.

worldwide distributed learning market, 1997-2002 108% CAGR. $15 billion market 28 months hence. 4,000 IBM researchers working specifically on online learning.

merrill’s book of knowledge: old days, learn to drive a tractor and it’s a useful skill for 40 years. now, product cycles cutting that time to a year.

IT turnover running 14%.

New competitive landscape

BIT BASED COMPANIES challenges to e-business: building brand awareness, economies of scale, lack of experience. think eToys

ATOM BASED COMPANIES fear and frustration for traditional business: diseconomies of scale, dysfunctional KM capabilities, speed to market. think ToysRUs

comptroller of the currency has 360 applications pending for internet banks!!!

leveraging online approaches to achieve results. deliver content as self-paced (rapid distribution, Lotus buys Pathware), collaborative (deeper learning, long-term results, Learning Space), live/virtual classroom (travel savings, standards). wrong for Lotus to do these piecemeal. need single object repository for content no matter how it’s delivered.

“Companies with an infrastructure of clients, content, technology, and services from a variety of sources will be the most successful.” – Ellen Julian, IDC

Need a place to create knowledge (Notes or Outlook. something convenient for sharing). Need to improve Search capability.

 

example of GE Medical

knowledge gap challenge

·        expand training options to field employees at a reasonable price

solution

·        use Learning Space for highly interactive, online learning

business value

·        allows mobile workforce to learn anytime, anywhere

·        maximizes employees’ productivity by increasing time with customers

 

multiple-path approach used. lots of collaboration.

 

 

Pathware demo

Daimler intro – good demo using Lotus Screencam. Walk-through. SmartForce would benefit from this approach.

 

 

Richard Close.

Ellen Julian. IDC will now use “e-Learning” in lieu of Internet-based learning, web-based training.

 

Why is elearning so critical today?

attract, retain, grow employees.

knowledge and skills recognized as critical resources in global economy.

revised valuation of human capital brings attention to skill gaps (senior management metric)

increased focus on continuous learning

 

competition

technology

employee turnover

small labor pools

 

IT training spending from ’96 to ‘98

‘96 $3,500

’97 $6,200

’98 $6,200

 

business and soft skills training in 1998

24% of IS department budget

42% outside the IS department

good bit of this is videotape (still)

in Ellen’s lingo, “Internet learning” includes intranets, extranets, internet time group

 

Interviews with 201 companies. 25% used IBL, larger companies

 

Satisfaction with Internet-based learning

85% training mgrs strongly recommend IBL

43% of other dept managers strongly recommend

60% IS managers as well

 

Reservations

not appropriate medium for all content

limited availability of content

difficult fit with existing IS infrastructure

prohibitive cost of content conversion

 

Other obstacles

managers not convinced of need for IBL

need for more interactivity and sophistication of course development

who will provide service and support? (Andersen, US West)

who will host

 

Rationale for IT Use

Scalable

Enables learners to take control of their learning paths

Reduces travel

Provides management with a way to track learner progress (down to the second)

 

What are vendors doing to address IBL needs?

converting content, chunking, object orientation

forming alliances

increasing focus on quality and interactivity

more robust solutions

adding thinks like mentoring

 

What lies ahead?

wider adoption of IBL (esp. by small co’s)

new purchases of learning solutions

supplier consolidation

enhancement of value-added services

(support, security[1], maintenance, mentoring, custom course development, hosting)

 

The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn. Alvin Toffler

 

Richard Close

Close Productions, Ridgefield CT  203.431.1541

closeprod@aol.com

 

think two years ago

expected market to explode as the channel grabs hold, but…

the IT training channel didn’t have software – they had instructors, tangible sell

 

shifted to multimedia front-end.

new players coming out of entertainment industry.

becoming a publishing company.

 

threat: Microsoft could offer certification training for free.

 

There’s no difference between marketing and training.

Millennium Trends

training and marketing merge to become learning

same developers, same technology, same cost structure, same audience, same tracking, same catalog systems. Jim Henson changed learning forever. they are the SAME.

 

professor retorts: the difference is “the truth.” yeah, sure.

 

branding becomes the way to select. vital for portals.

 

40-50% have outside web sites, <10% have all-inclusive in-house corporate site.

 

bifurcation: content separate from technology

consider the American history course --- Will it come from the History Channel or Prentice Hall? Will the geography course come from McGraw Hill or the Travel Channel?

 

Too many parts

 

Learner/Searcher

Infrastructure

1.     campus front-end – open code

2.     course mgmt system (1,2,3) – learning space, Asymetrix

3.     AICC content – if the industry doesn’t get this together, SONY will do it for them. can’t survive like old-style component stereos where components didn’t work with one another

Learning Objectives ­

Knowledge/Information ­

 

 

need to support your corporate culture. everything you need. cushy. like working for Disney. don’t let them out where monster board bartering for their services one click away.

 

try AOL. it’s a real community. think of college – you met your peers outside of class.

 

Technologies will merge

intranet web sites (five year focus) (think of it as an in-house shopping mall), corporate campus systems, course management systems (development tools, Microsoft Office is my authoring language), learning catalogs (some talk of data farming, other side is managing the knowledge inside of people’s heads), HR systems, personnel systems, km systems, help desk support systems, CDs and distance learning products

 

Applications will merge

Product launch training (easiest to sell) mixes a variety of skills, soft skills, tech skills, business process skills, regulation skills (heavy pain factor), branding programs.

 

Department will merge

future is one company campus. who is going to manage this? marketing? personnel? product development? training department? information resources? help desk? IT information support?

 

Industries will merge

companies will merge into sole source learning organizations (learning conglomerates & portals). multimedia tools, IBL software, systems integration, helpdesk, classroom training, IBL hosting, content developers

 

distance learning should be a cradle-to-grave relationship. SONY could bring this together. the money to do this is flowing in.

 

Commercial & academic merge

academic will subcontract commercial IT, academic re-licenses from academic (e.g. franchise MIT’s tech courses), commercial and academic will compete and collaborate (run harvard MBA on your learning server), corporate university will get accredited (and compete), cost of higher degree may plunge, exclusivity to high degree may fade, certifications may both consolidate and fragment.

 

Things get a lot easier

1.     search learning. “I need this now.” LoD.

2.     surf learning. flipping through or matrix learning

 

integration of new product info, help desk, user training, tech training

 

information portals. broadcast vs publisher vs training companies, paid vs. free

 

Everything will go global

multilingual, no physical financial or cultural restrictions, links between info gestalts/communities will increase, global matrix of info sharing

 

Learning Servers (from SMGNet)

Blackboard – simplistic, education market only. free course prep and hosting

Asynchronous Servers

threaded discussion

embedded email system

course home page

various quiz, survey, assessment formats,

file transfer area for student-instructor exchange

chat sessions

ability to embed audio

class roster

online registration

test score and progress tracking

admin

leaner functions

security functions

 

ibm, Microsoft, & Oracle – the survivors

 

librarian from Asymetrix

saba ems from saba

LOIS and KOTRAIN from knowledgesoft

phoenix from pathlore

lotus learningspace

web mentor from avilar

top class from wbt systems

attain from macromedia

blackboard’s courseinfo

gen21’s generation21 (acquired by vantage)

 

free to $Kthousands, few dollars per student, all over

 

 

Synchronous Servers

“virtual classroom”

 

allow you to present authored course materials on a synch basis

allow participant registration

two way dialog (audio, text, soon video) between instructor and students

classroom controls

whiteboards, breakout rooms

application sharing

web access

 

Centra. raise your hand. post your powerpoint. do surveys. testing capability: quizzes and tests with immediate feedback. were losing to thin client versions such as placeware so came out with symposium99, a thin-client version.

 

technical issues

may require NT

may require specific browser version

high speed net connection (T1)

may require conference call telephony

webmaster

microphones and headsets

net congestion? dial up networking?

IT support !!!! (both – client & server)

 

thin-client symposium or placeware cuts out audio

 

brightlight  www.avalon.com

symposium www.centra.com

databeam www.databeam.com

learnlinc www.ilinc.com

placeware www.placeware.com

horizon Live www.horizonlive.com

 

it’s like talk radio. best with an engineer, a troubleshooter, a producer

 

caliber is essentially videoconferencing. learning center (bricks). started with satellite.

 

·        cost $10 to $35K

·        plus hardware, software, net connections, technical time, authoring time, management time

·        annual licensing fees

do it first on a hosted basis. (now all vendors provide this. the vendors will walk you through, help with instructional design)

 

do they work? ISA. most still alpha, for internal use. best results from IT companies. Elliott says “scalability is the $!00m question.”

 

needs to be a short event. 45-minute window.

 

if you’ve seen them live, it’s a more positive experience. also, if you know your peers.

 

issues overall

know your audience: the interface can make a big difference.

understand technology limitations.

built-in course navigation can be confusing to some users.

 

does the learning server support all of your WBT development needs?

·        can html content be directly edited, or does it have to be done through the system’s authoring tool?

·        does it support embedded streamed audio or video?

·        will java applets work?

·        can existing tests and quizzes be easily integrated into the Learning Server’s system?

·        can you use data for other apps?

 

more tech issues@

administration complexity

firewall issues

port existing student databases in?

security adequate for your network?

installation – onsite support necessary?

 

standards

AICC (Airline industry)

IMS (Instructional Management System)

T.120 (data collaboration)

H.232 (video)

 

James Brodo, Michael Aronson.

 

major database providers will end up buying these companies.

 

 

Harvi Singh, Empower,

Six Keys to Next Generation Enterprise Learning Management Systems

learner at the center. as with everything these days. personalization, customization, individual. www.empower-co.com

 

Online Learning Infrastructure

·        What are the components of it?

·        How to implement it at an Enterprise level?

·        When to implmenet it

·        Where to implement it on the net

·        Who would be involved

·        Why do you need it?

 

Content Developer’s Perspective

·        from instructor-led to learner-centric

·        long to short or rapid development and delivery cycles (instant creation and publishing)

·        reusable learning objects

·        from text-based to interactive experiences

·        from multimedia designer/programmer to SME (templates)

·        from single author to group authoring

·        from single mode to multi-mode delivery (ILT, print, self-paced, facilitated, CD-ROM)

 

Content Delivery Perspective

·        from large courses to searchable learning objects

·        from learn once to continuous learning

·        from classroom to ojt, jit

·        from mass to individualized and mixed-mode

·        from individual to collaborative learning

·        from passive learner to participatory knowledge contributor

·        from pay once to pay per use

 

Administrative Perspective

·        centrally administered and track progress/performance

·        ease of registration, notification, purports, and other service

·        different level s of measurement/evaluation (reaction, learning, behavior, results)

 

Technology Perspective

·        from proprietary to open systems

·        from monolithic to component-based, object-oriented design

·        from limited to scalable

·        from single-user to client-server to web

 

Standards

EDUCASE’s IMS www.imsproject.org,

and www.adlnet.org, www.ieee.org, www.aicc.cog

 

 

Components

·        analysis – identifying needs

·        learner-centric delivery/access: online, collaborative, references
login, personal portfolio, catalog, search resources, notifications, learner profile, progress reports, email

·        content authoring & aggregation

·        competency management

·        administration & management
add & delete users, assign resources, manage groups

·        instructor-led training management

·        ERP connection
import/export data, direct data access

·        evaluation & business results

 

rumor has it that the press conference was a bomb.

 

Show and tell

learnerscope

 

IMS Metadata: title, new desciprtion, English, price, category, date, contibuotr, role, orgn name, location, cost, software required. all in XML.

 

User Interface

 

Business Logic

 

Data Services (the data foundation ODBC or OLA or…]]

 

scale

content stored in database repository

extensibility

durability

interoperability

 

when to implement

 

Wednesday, October 20, 1999, 11:17 AM

 

Tom Davenport, Andersen & Babson

How do you know what you know?

 

Technology push = much old wine in new bottles

Business pull = to overcome corporate amnesia, global info sharing

Many small, function-specific projects – but few transformational ones

Lots of conceptual confusion – knowledge, information, learning, etc.

What is knowledge management?

Tom thinks the confusion is positive; overlap doesn’t hurt anything.

How do we advance from here?

 

early problems in knowledge management

·        lots of definitional debates

·        knowledge – highest valued added, generally human-created

·        too much emphasis on repositories – 80% of the KM Tom sees – big bucket of knowledge

·        let’s put knowledge on the balance sheet – Tom says it won’t happen in our lifetime – E&Y: “Don’t we get sued enough as it is?”

·        knowledge separated from learning, often corporate oil & water

 

as we mature

knowledge too important to leave to the professionals. Andersen has >500 knowledge managers! but ultimately it’s the amateurs who count. every business and business process is potentially knowledge-intensive. lots of companies have filled the warehouses of information to overflowing.

 

compare this to inventory management. at first, the goal was to insure that you never run out. fill up the warehouse. now let’s keep it lean. same for knowledge management.

 

next big thing. plenty of information out there. but starved for attention. attention is a precursor to learning. how do we get attention? how do we focus our own attention? and in online learning, it’s far too easy to lose attention, to tune out. online learning better be very sticky.

 

recruiting. are the candidates interested in knowledge? “Did you check out our web page? Read anything about us?”

 

What does it matter if I’m off playing golf somewhere as long as I’m thinking?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

people, process, technology; in context, content in the center. consultant’s mantra.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

People. it’s like forming a club.

 

begin with professionals: knowledge leaders, knowledge initiative managers, knowledge facilitators

 

to advance, focus on the amateurs. how much time should we spend on it? hire knowledge-seeking people. (intellectual curiosity – genetically determined?),

 

Knowledge-Oriented Culture and Behavior

·        to begin, focus on subculture. find one where knowledge matters, no obvious culture barriers.

·        to advance, focus on long-term cultural change. big incentives, senior management example, Planck’s progress (progress is physics often a matter of a few funerals).

 

You could read a book. Mine would be great, but any will do. (Little secret: it’s probably more effective than flying to LA to hear me talk.)

 

All life is a Process!

knowledge work is a process. marketing, r&d, customer service, consulting, managing, etc.