|
|
This business of eLearning. |
|
|
Time is precious. Corporate eLearning that fails to advance the core business holds it back. The only metrics that matter are business metrics. This report addresses how an organization can apply networked learning to improve earnings and competitive advantage. Internet Time Group is focused on learning that improves performance. Last year, we talked with more than a hundred corporations and eLearning vendor executives in person or on the phone. We asked them to imagine the CEO of a major organization just got in their elevator. She asks, "eLearning? What's in it for me?" Most of our conversations lasted more than 30 minutes. Some conclusions follow. |
![]() CEO: "What's in it for me?" |
|
|
|
The Internet
didn’t change everything but it certainly improved the way people can learn.
Companies are using networked learning to accelerate sales, out-innovate
competitors, enter new lines of business and knock customers’ socks off.
They are employing interactive, networked learning to:
Executives who cling to yesterday’s haphazard means of developing their people suffer from corporate dyslexia: they can’t read the handwriting on the wall. In the age of information, learning is the ultimate survival skill. Enthusiastic, knowledgeable people are the key to corporate success. Learning is the essence of eLearningeLearning is neither a technology nor the latest incarnation of computer-based training. Truth be told, eLearning is the buzzword, analogous to eBusiness, which inspired executives to contemplate learning as meaningful and exciting, a potentially worthwhile investment. The “e” is a marketing gimmick, a flashy way to say that technology is involved, but the learning part is valuable and real. eLearning is learning on Internet time. Speed is important, because customers flock to the enterprise whose people are consistently first to deliver service that exceeds their expectations. eLearning is how large organizations keep pace with today’s incessant rate of change. If your value chain were the Internet, your people would be the infamous “last mile.” Success feeds upon itself. Once more, Charles Fred: “A breakaway starts when you reach the proficiency threshold. Proficient workers become contributing team members; they produce innovative ideas; they work safely but quickly, they go on to achieve even greater levels of proficiency, and they win the race.” Don’t expect miraclesAs with any revolution, hucksters hitch a ride on the enthusiasm over real breakthroughs. Indeed, a primary mission of eLearningForum is running the snake oil out of the market. Let’s look at five things eLearning is not: Not a cure-all. eLearning is not a shotgun remedy for corporate learning disabilities. It’s more effective for surgical strikes on specific business targets than for carpet-bombing the entire organization. Not a substitute for instructors. Just as television did not wipe out movies, eLearning doesn’t necessarily replace instructors; it supplements them. Until computers can ad lib or read confusion in a learner’s face, people will continue to conduct the majority of corporate learning events. Not a single technology. The best way to learn depends on the context—what’s to be learned, the outcomes sought, the individual learner, the value of the outcome, and urgency. Common wisdom holds that a blend of in-person events and web-delivery works better than either of them alone. People learn by solving problems, by making mistakes and correcting them, by hearing stories, by engaging multiple senses and by following the call of their innate curiosity. The promise of eLearning is to facilitate these styles of learning. Not generally cheaper than traditional learning. Savings of travel, facilities, and salaries are often balanced by costs of setting up learning infrastructure. EVA comes from top-line benefits such as more loyal customers, entry into new markets, greater reach, and shorter cycles. |
Six months later. My findings have held up remarkably well but these days I'm taking them further. It's not the learning that counts, it's the doing. Learning is but one of the means to an end. A one-liner at a conference crystallized this for me: "No one else calls them learners." Call them knowledge workers. If we can help them improve performance through training or networking or on-job support or by giving them subscriptions to Martha Stewart Living, let's just do it. Learning is but one arrow in the performance improvement quiver. To achieve results, we should do whatever it takes. Learning isn't separate from work. In a knowledge society, learning is the work. |